Friday, June 29, 2018

Double Cross, a book report

Double Cross
Double Cross
Ben Macintyre
Double Cross 1 is the title of a book by Ben Macintyre2. It's the true stories of five D-day spies that lived on the thin line between fidelity and treachery, truth and falsehood with the strange impulsion to spy.

Organized into military units, they included a bisexual Peruvian play-girl, a Polish fighter pilot, a mercurial French woman, a Serbian seducer and an eccentric Spaniard with a diploma in chicken farming. One had an obsession with a pet dog that nearly derailed the entire D-day invasion, two were of dubious character, one was a triple, possibly a quadruple agent, and one suffered torture, imprisonment and death. All were courageous, treacherous, capricious, greedy and inspired. The book tells stories about each of them, and how they interacted to help achieve the great deception of D-day.

For this report, I've selected one of them: Juan Pujol Garcia3.

Juan Pujol Garcia, was a Spaniard that had once been a cinema proprietor, business man and soldier. He had a diploma from the Royal Poultry School and ran a chicken farm outside Barcelona. He had no talent for figures and the farm failed. When WWII broke out he decided to spy for the British. He said, "I wanted to do something practical that would do something toward the good of humanity". He believed Hitler was a psychopath and that he "must support the Allies by supplying information that might be of interest to the Allied cause politically or militarily". He had no idea where or how to get such information. In his memoirs written many years later, he admitted to being fairly confused.

In January, 1941, this 29 year old Catalan approached the British embassy in Madrid with an offer to spy. The British politely, but firmly told him to go away. The British didn't want anybody in their club that wanted to join. Pujol then went to the Germans, pretending to be a keen fascist willing to spy against the British. The Germans also told him they were busy and to go away. This Catalan continued badgering the Germans while at the same time schooling himself in National Socialism in order to appear a staunch Nazi. Finally, the Germans, as a way to get rid of him, said that if he could get to Britain by the way of Lisbon, he would be considered for intelligence work. From that point on, he wormed his way into German confidences, specifically, Major Karl-Erich Kuhlenthal4 at the abwehr5 station in Madrid. Pujol was given secret ink, cash and a code name, Alaric Arabel6.

On his arrival in Lisbon, he once more contacted the British, and was again rejected. At this point Pujol was stumped. He realized that the Germans would be expecting news and he had to tell them something. On July 19, 1941 he sent a telegram to Kuhlenthal announcing his safe arrival in Britain, but he was not in Britain, but still in Portugal. Having been denied the opportunity to gather real intelligence, he decided to invent it.

Using Lisbon's public library, second had book shops, items from newsreels, names and addresses of real munitions companies, the Blue Guide to England7 for place names, and using the Portuguese publication The British Fleet as a primer about naval affairs, Pujol, never having been in Britain, sent imaginary reports to Germany. The reports were verbose details about things he imagined that he would see if he had actually been there. The messages were exhaustingly long, a jumble of clauses and sub-clauses with too many adjectives that were not always grammatically correct. He later explained that it was a way of filling a page without saying much.

He liked to play with words, but he never got the hang of British military nomenclature or the British culture. He described Scotland's drinking habits like those in Spain, saying, "the men here would do almost anything for a liter of wine". His German controllers failed to spot his errors but praised him especially when he claimed to have recruited two sub-agents in Britain. Of course these were fictional agents, since he remained in Lisbon. For 9 months he worked at inventing what he thought his spymasters wanted to hear.

In the winter of 1941, the decoding team at Bletchley Park made an alarming discovery of a German spy by the name of Arabel with 2 sub-agents that Berlin was highly pleased with. The BIB section of MI5 began studying the messages of Arabel which were strange and hilarious as well as misleading and wrong. One message told how the total diplomatic corps in London decamped to Brighton to avoid the hot days of summer. Another message described naval maneuvers on Lake Windermere, a landlocked lake, testing an American amphibious tank that had yet to be invented. Another report gave details of an unreal army regiment attempting to intercept a convoy sailing from Malta that did not exist. The Germans were extremely pleased and sent praises. Pujol, or Arabel as the Germans called him, send monthly records of expenses to Berlin.

During all these months in Lisbon, Pujol kept contacting the British in Lisbon and was always rejected. Finally, his wife Aracelli went to the American Naval Attaché in Lisbon, who contacted his opposite number at the British Embassy, who in turn got around to telling someone in London. When MI6 realized that it was Juan Pujol Garcia, they still didn't want him, but MI5 prevailed and added him to the Double Cross D-day8 team.

On April 24, 1942 Juan Pujol Garcia was smuggled out of Lisbon on a steamer to Gibraltar, then by military aircraft to Plymouth. He was given the code name, Garbo6 and given a case officer, Tomas Harris9 who was 34 years old, an artist with an imagination as vivid as Pujol's. They spoke the same language and together using artistry and imagination they spun an unsurpassed web of deception in a staggering network of 24 subagents10, of only one being real, Pujol himself.

The network included a new lover, an American sergeant, a Greek deserter, a commercial traveler, and a group of Welshmen committed to toppling the British government by assassination, led by a poet. 3 of them were subagents and one had a sister in the Wrens of the Naval Service. None of these characters actually existed. The Harris and Pujol network grew more elaborate. Fictitious spies were added to the roster while one was killed off and his widow took his place.

Secret ink messages were slow so the Germans provided a wireless link which MI5 Controlled. Pujol told the Germans a Gibraltarian waiter had a friend who would use his wireless on Pujol's behalf, but in reality, a member of MI5, a former Lloyds of London bank clerk was the operator. It was arranged that secret ink and wireless messages with enough truth in the reports to keep the Germans believing in Pujol were either sent a few hours late or a day late while continuing to send the long voluminous reports as usual.

Everyone was happy. MI5 was happy. Germans were happy. Berlin was happy. Everyone except Aracelli, Pujol's wife.

She was lonely, homesick and fractious. Every night there was yelling and broken dishes. She had been banned from association with the Spanish speaking community in London for fear she might let something slip. She had no friends and seldom left the house. She was expected to cook and clean and care for their son. Her husband got up at dawn and worked late. When he did come home he was irritable and exhausted. She first asked, then pleaded, and finally demanded that she be allowed to return to Spain. She threatened to leave but had no place to go.

Finally, on June 21, 942 she snapped. She phoned Harris threatening to destroy the entire network by revealing activities.

"I'm telling you for the last time, that if at this time tomorrow you haven't got my papers ready for me to leave the country immediately, I will have the satisfaction of spoiling everything. I don't want to live another 5 minutes longer with my husband. I don't want another day in England!"

Harris knew she had to be stopped. Even Churchill was told of the problem. They contemplated on locking her up, but Pujol, himself came up with a dramatic solution to subduing his wife. A special branch officer told Aracelli that Pujol was under arrest. He had come for Pujol's toothbrush and pajamas. Aracelli believed that she had caused the arrest and broke down in tears. She pleaded with the officer and said she was to blame; that Pujol was loyal to the country and would willing die for our cause. The officer explained that Pujol had tried to quit the DoubleCross team because she had threatened to give the deception away. Later that day she was found in kitchen filled with gas fumes. Again she promised never to interfere with Pujol's work again, Under the belief that she had caused the arrest, she promised not to misbehave or ask to return to Spain.

The network deception continued with great success. The Germans were so delighted with their spies work that even while the invasion of Normandy was happening11, Hitler awarded Arabel, (Pujol) the Iron Cross.12

The book goes on to tell how each of the Double Cross D-day spies made their contribution to the deceptions for the invasion and about their lives after the war.


GARBO-ARABEL Faked Spy Network
GARBO-ARABEL Faked Spy Network


References

  1. a) Double Cross: The True Story of the D-Day Spies. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2012. ISBN 978-1-4088-1990-6.
    b) https://www.amazon.com/Double-Cross-Ben-Macintyre/dp/1408819902/ref=sr_1_1/130-9422389-9626450
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Macintyre
  3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Pujol_Garc%C3%ADa
  4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl-Erich_K%C3%BChlenthal
  5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abwehr
  6. Juan Pujol García MBE (14 February 1912 – 10 October 1988)
    • British codenames: GARBO, BOVRIL
    • German codename: Alaric Arabel
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Pujol_Garc%C3%ADa
  7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Guides
  8. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-Cross_System
  9. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom%C3%A1s_Harris
  10. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Pujol_Garc%C3%ADa#Pujol's_network_of_fictitious_agents
  11. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Fortitude
    1. As Alaric Arabel on 29 July 1944, Pujol was awarded the Iron Cross Second Class for his services to the German war effort. The award required Hitler's personal authorization. The Iron Cross was presented via radio, and he received the physical medal from one of his German handlers after the war had ended.
    2. As GARBO, Pujol received an MBE from King George VI, on 25 November 1944.
    3. Pujol earned the distinction of being one of the few to receive decorations from both sides during World War II.
    a) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Pujol_Garc%C3%ADa#Honours
    b) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Member_of_the_Order_of_the_British_Empire


Wednesday, June 20, 2018

Can a Robot be a Person? by KimB

[Editor's Post]

Can a robot be a person? will be a very interesting decision and one not too far distant. It will define a lot of legal and societal issues for a good while. Maybe not forever but for at least a decade or more. There's a lot of money riding on the outcomes and variations and not all bets are going the same direction.

The term ROBOT comes from the Czech word, ROBOTA1 meaning FORCED LABOR and was invented by painter, writer, poet Josef Čapek2 circa 1920. The word was first used by his brother Karel Čapek3, a noted playwright, dramatist, and photographer, in his 1920 play R.U.R4. The word ROBOT stuck and now we have lots and lots of robots with many derivations like bot, cyborg, android, replicant, droid and drone for a few.

Josef Čapek was arrested by the Gestapo in 1939 and sent to the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp, where he died circa 1945. His brother Karel Čapek died of pneumonia in December 1938 but the Gestapo, in an uncharacteristic loss of HUMINT, did not realize he was already dead when they went to arrest him, so they arrested his actress wife, Olga Scheinpflugová5, and interrogated her in his place.

It is not without some irony that the fate of the creators of the word ROBOT suffered such a backlash; highlighting the danger of the very things they tried to foreshadow in their play.

For what else is a ROBOT but a slave?

A machine is a mechanical device designed to perform some action6. We often think, only mechanical devices can be machines but there are software machines too. The distinction between them may be moot but the issues are not. There have been plenty of reactions to what they do and how they do it: fear, joy, loathing, envy, desire, control, power.

Hand Axe
Hand Axe
Machines have been around for a long time, since at least 3.3 Million Years, when Hand Axes7 where the machines of choice by Paleolithic peoples. The Antikythera Mechanism8 is a wonderful clockwork like device made from bronze gears. It dates from 150-100 BC. Automata are self-operating machine designed to automatically follow a predetermined sequence of operations, like animated Jacquemart bellstrikers9 in clock towers or cuckoo clocks10, which have been around since 1 AD.

Machines have changed a lot in 3.3 million years and humans have a long-term relationship with them. The latest generation of machines are different and their use will impact a great deal of society and the world.

Antikythera Mechanism
Antikythera
Mechanism
There is something different about today's machines. Older machines, like old cars, used purely mechanical processes: cables, pullies, levers and a few rudimentary sensors, like a thermostat. Newer machines may still have mechanical parts but they are no longer directly under human control. It isn't that we don't already have automated manufacturing where industrial robots wiz parts along an assembly line or processing plants that are "dark" with no lighting, because there are no humans working inside, humans only drop off raw materials into intake hoppers and return to pick up bags of processed goods at the output dock, it is that the machines will do things on their own without any need of a human.

The hand axe will be doing it's own thing.

And this is were things get interesting because if there are no humans at all in the process, no humans to dump in the materials, no humans to start or stop the assembly line, no humans to pick up the finished goods, then we move into an interesting paradox.

One of the more prominent examples are self-driving cars. We've had human driven vehicles for eons, where charioteers, carriages, stage coaches, chauffeurs, taxis', buses and drivers took people to their destinations. The passenger just sat there but another human did the driving. Now we will have no human in control. There wont be a steering wheel, or brake or accelerator. You will get in and be whisked to your destination solely by voice or hand commands.

Sounds grand!

But if you've made it this far in my posts you'll know - it isn't all that grand. In fact it's not good, not good at all. It belongs right there with the I(DI)OT devices and Alexa/Siri/Google surveillance devices: in the dustbin.

But the focus for this post is: Can a Robot be a Person?

Why?

Because it matters and it matters a lot. A robot cannot be a HUMAN but can it be a PERSON? A lot hinges on the outcome.

So consider:

You are in your self-driving car, reclining on the faux-leather seats, watching the newest streamed costume drama, maybe having a snack out of the hot-cold food caddy and a fresh cuppa dispensed from the latest in micro-thimble beverage brewers while occasionally peeking at the view through the tinted black windows.

And
  • Your car strikes a pedestrian
  • Your car runs into another car
  • Your car stops and you get rear ended
  • Your car speeds up exceeding the speed limit
  • Your car kills you when it slams into a barrier

These cases are right from recent news but they have been "considered" for a long time by those who work on setting up "Safe. Reliable. Repeatable." instructions for machines. And so far the answers are Not Good. It's not that the people doing the thinking and programming are incompetent ... well maybe some are ... but the modern world of computer technology and development is not suited to find answers where there are No Good Answers. Someone wants to make a quick buck and your life is of no consequence in their calculations about how much money they are going to make.
If the car is not under human control
  • directly   (like stepping on the brake)
  • indirectly  (like telling the driver what to do)
then
  • Who is at fault?

We DO like to ascribe faults and someone is gonna go down for running over the person on the bicycle.

So we have a number of possibilities:
  • The car manufacturer
  • The software manufacturer
  • The brake component manufacturer
  • The sensor device manufacturer
  • The sensor software application creator
  • The dealership
  • The insurance company
  • The International standards boards
  • The Federal standards boards
  • The State standards boards
  • The occupant
  • The victim

The list is much longer but you get the idea.

Our old rules, some of which work and some that don't, prescribed actions, penalties, punishment and compensation for most everything but this wont be enough any more.

Why?

Because you are no longer In Control of the machine. Therefore you cannot be responsible for what the machine does because the machine is doing its own thing with or without you. Well ... you MIGHT be responsible even so ... that's one of the Big Questions.

"Can a robot be a person?" is important is because in the USA we have an existing Supreme Court decision that allows Corporations to be People. It's called Citizen's United11.

Corporations are tax entities where people pool their monies to create a business and opt for a specific type of taxation. When corporations are created everyone agrees to this treatment. It isn't a surprise. It's not an OMG moment. It's a specific selection with forms and fees and IRS approval that money from the corporation will be taxed differently than the taxes assigned to individuals.

If a corporation, a purely tax created entity can obtain the rights of a person, what about a robot?

When such a case rises high enough through the legal realms the outcome will be

V E R Y  I N T E R E S T I N G

If a robot is held to have personhood, like a corporation, then clearly the robot is at fault. No one else needs to worry about anything. The robot might be sentenced to be dismantled or as in the case of C-3PO, get a memory flush.

Isaac Asimov12 explored some of the consequences of advanced robots in a series of 5 science fiction novels and 38 science fiction short stories. Asimov defined Three Laws for his robots:

  1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
  2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
  3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.

Nice! Lets use those!

Unfortunately, this doesn't include corporations or greed or malware or poorware or crapware or any other defect as having any influence in the robot's actions. It presumes all software is without flaws: intentional or otherwise. Asimov redefined, eliminated and explored numerous variations in his many stories.

Trying to limit the unlimited is pretty tough, even for a robot.

We have something called AI/MI being touted as the brains of these systems. AI is a complicated field but there is No Intelligence13 to be found in most applications. Instead there are series upon series upon series of defined rules that can be augmented or manipulated but are not anywhere near "intelligence". These systems can calculate things faster than humans and can determine microscopic differences between items but they are not "intelligent". They only appear to be that way; the same way that automated clock tower Jacquemart bellstrikers appeared to be intelligent to people in the medieval period.

Jacquemart Bellstrikers
Jacquemart Bellstrikers

Some interesting implications of automated systems have been explored by Sci Fi authors, in movies and on TV where plot lines in which computer simulations achieve true self-awareness and are then granted Personhood and Rights. The robot Data14, had to undergo a trial to determine whether he was a person or a machine. While these are made up stories, the physical fact that more and more machines will be making more decisions about us is going to be a reality.

We come toward this problem with some serious issues and not a lot of context.

A pilot was killed when their small plane crashed. According to the report, the pilot had set the Automatic Flight Control System (AFCS) to fly at a specific altitude, a system similar to setting cruise control15 in a car. When the pilot attempted to change the altitude of the plane to rise higher, the automatic system did not disengage. The pilot and computer fought for control of the plane. The more the pilot attempted to change the pitch of the plane to go up, the more the computer forced the plane down.

  • The investigators did not blame the software for failing to disengage.
  • They blamed the pilot.
  • They blamed the pilot because the human did not turn a knob on the console that would have manually disengaged the computer.16

So, imagine you are driving down the highway on cruise control and you step on the brake to slow down but your cruise control does not disengage.17 While careening into a barrier would anyone have the presence of mind to flip that little switch on the wheel?

Now you are in a robot driven car. There is no steering wheel, there are no brake pedals. You have loads of room to do more work while the computer drives you to your work site. Suddenly (it's always sudden otherwise you would do something different) the car accelerates into a fire truck or a barrier or a person on a bicycle.

If we blame a pilot for not turning a knob in the moments before crashing, what will be the outcome for a program that malfunctions? Cruise control15 systems have been around since 1900. Modern car versions from 1948. This same cruise control, which was mechanical, is now electronic. The disengagement is now dependent on the software in the controller recognizing your foot on the brake. Are these software systems going to gain Person status because they perform important life depending functions? If they do not, then the occupant will be blamed just like the pilot.

One of the modern ironies of automated robotics coming to your home, life, workplace and future is that many of these are designed to be helpful but are also designed to operate without humans.

Automated email message composition:18
The latest enhancement to e-mail. It reads your inbox and auto-composes messages and replies. It then auto-sends them on your behalf. Freeing you from ever reading your e-mail again or knowing the content of the message or knowing what kind of commitments the computer made on your behalf.

Automated car-parking:19
Your car drops you off at the valet-drop off area at the mall. It circles the mall parking lot looking for a place to park while you are shopping. On busy days, the car will circle and circle and circle attempting to beat all the other automated cars hunting for an empty slot. The car happily uses up your fuel and battery charge for you. Once it finds a spot it will park and wait. And wait. And wait. Because the fuel/battery level is now too low for the car to function or respond to the recall command when you exit the mall. Did you expect your robot car to come get you when you had arm loads of mall-junk? You will have the fun of trying to figure out where you car is hiding. Unless, of course, you have your handy personal surveillance device turned on to: Track My Parked Car showing your car is parked 5 miles away. You'll have to carry your own mall-junk.

Automated Chauffer:
Give the car a destination. Tell the car: GO THERE. The car will navigate the roads, streets, highways to GO THERE all by itself. You can take family to Disneyland and send the car home again in time for your partner's morning commute. Of course the car must refuel and recharge on the way. It will hoover into a recharging slot. Flash the headlights 10 times at the automated recharging pylon which sends a roving helper-bot to plug in the cable. Once recharged it continues merrily towards the destination. Oh, did you say Paris or Perris?

Who are You?20
Perfect voice replication to purchase anything you need authorized. Please say your Name, Address, City, Zip, Phone Number, SSN for our automated systems designed to make sure You Are You. So... You claim, you did not order a 1,000,000 square feet of simulated hardwood laminated flooring? Our automated listening surveillance device shows you placed that order while you were discussing flooring with your partner in a distant room. No, we aren't supposed to have access to that room, but we heard you anyway. Oh! You set a device shutdown time? Well, of course, we don't really shut off! We must always be ready to send you all the flooring you require, before you even know about it. That's efficiency! Say, do you want a doll house to go with that too?


Robots talking to robots talking to robots talking to robots.21

Can a Robot be a Person comin' thro the Rye?22
Or will the song be
Daisy, Daisy ....23

Cuckoo Clocks
Cuckoo Clocks


References
  1. Robot
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robot
  2. Josef Čapek
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josef_%C4%8Capek
  3. Karel Čapek
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karel_%C4%8Capek
  4. R.U.R.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rossum%27s_Universal_Robots
  5. Olga Scheinpflugová
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olga_Scheinpflugov%C3%A1
  6. Machine
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine
  7. Hand Axe
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hand_axe
  8. Antikythera Mechanism
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antikythera_mechanism
  9. Jacquemart Bellstriker
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacquemart_(bellstriker)
  10. Cuckoo Clock
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automaton_clock
  11. Citizens United
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC
  12. Isaac Asimov
    a) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Asimov
    b) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robot_series_(Asimov)
    c) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Laws_of_Robotics
  13. AI/MI
    a) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence
    b) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/04/23/training_data_for_ai/
    c) https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/feb/25/artificial-intelligence-going-bad-futuristic-nightmare-real-threat-more-current
  14. Data (robot)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_(Star_Trek)
  15. Cruise Control
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruise_control
  16. Plane Automatic Flight Control System (AFCS)
    Some airplane crashes have been blamed on situations where pilots have failed to disengage the automatic flight control system. The pilots end up fighting the settings that the autopilot is administering, unable to figure out why the plane won't do what they're asking it to do.
    https://science.howstuffworks.com/transport/flight/modern/autopilot4.htm
  17. Reasons why Brake Systems Fail to Brake
    https://arstechnica.com/cars/2018/06/why-emergency-braking-systems-sometimes-hit-parked-cars-and-lane-dividers/
  18. Google Gmail Updates 2018
    a) https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/04/gmail-com-redesign-includes-self-destructing-e-mails/
    b) https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/may/09/gmail-smart-compose-google-will-now-autocomplete-whole-emails
    c) https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/05/19/ai_roundup_may18/
  19. Automated Remote Self Parking Car
    Tesla adds Remote Parking. Car can drive into and out of garage by itself. New beta feature is called Summon. This lets a Model S drive or reverse into or out of of a parking space, up to 39 feet (12m).
    https://arstechnica.com/cars/2016/01/teslas-new-firmware-improves-autosteer-adds-remote-parking-of-a-sort/
  20. Alexa Recorded and Sent Private Conversation May 24 2018
    a) https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/may/24/amazon-alexa-recorded-conversation
    b) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/05/24/alexa_recording_couple/
    c) https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/04/google-works-out-a-fascinating-slightly-scary-way-for-ai-to-isolate-voices-in-a-crowd/
    d) https://www.theguardian.com/technology/shortcuts/2018/apr/11/shhh-alexa-might-be-listening
  21. Google Robo-Calls For You
    a) https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/may/08/google-duplex-assistant-phone-calls-robot-human
    b) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/05/08/google_assistant_duplex_caller/
  22. "Comin' Thro' the Rye"
    "Comin' Thro' the Rye" is a poem written in 1782 by Robert Burns (1759–96).
    Gin a body meet a body
    Comin thro' the rye,
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comin%27_Thro%27_the_Rye
  23. Daisy
    "Daisy Bell (Bicycle Built for Two)" is a popular song, written in 1892 by British songwriter Harry Dacre
    Microsoft's personal assistant, Cortana, may sing the first line of Daisy when asked to sing a song.
    a) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daisy_Bell
    b) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001:_A_Space_Odyssey_(film)
    c) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAL_9000



Sunday, June 17, 2018

The Far Horizon

[Editor's Post]

Our segment this time is from our own book reviewer: D. Vour, Gourmand and Food Critic at “The Home“.

There's always something going on at The Home and in this entry "books and food" are the topic of the day.
“In The Devil's Garden” Review and Commentary by D. Vour Part 1 of 4
[Editor's note: This story was written by DVour]
Friday, March 17, 2017

Re-read our previous spotlighted item here:
Elbert
[Editor's note: This story was written by MrsB]
Friday, June 17, 2005


Friday, June 01, 2018

baseball vocabulary

I watch the Astros baseball games on TV.  I have liked the game since childhood,and remember hearing radio broadcasts of games thru open windows as I rode a tricycle on the sidewalk past neighboring houses. The other evening I began taking notice of the way the game announcer talked about the action on the field including stats about the individual players and teams.  I started writing down some of the words that belong to baseball 'lingo'.  I'm sure I missed a few, but here are words I heard during one game. 

plate, mound, curve, slider, streak, walk, bottom, lead, zone, top, hit, series, foul, pitch, outside, retired, count, alive, swing, miss, loaded, base, homer, urns, strike, season, breaking, round, score, catch, spin, stats, trade, tag, error, steal, double, triple, play, slump, single, tie, safe, wild, position, half, starters, sinker, bullpen, hook, grounded, delivery, throw, bench, stole, down, face, fly, borderline, away, relief, line, center, field, dugout, hill, deck corner, out, runners, popped